Justine Bateman looks like Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, turning the “victim” into an Olympic sport.
Alumni of “Family Relationships” slammed the Duke and Duchess of Sussex on the weekend with a brand new Duke and Duchess of Sussex, titled “The downside with Meghan Markle: It's not what she's doing, it's the victim Olympic highway, and she brought it there.”
“The problem with Meghan Markle (and her husband Harry) is that every option they explored or exploited over the past few years has been due to their very radical suffering Olympic marketing campaigns.”
Bateman, 59, argued that “the past two years and now do it” made a “huge” difference a few years after they left Britain and quit their royal family.
“It's 2025 and no one needs to see the victim again,” she wrote. “No one needs to observe one thing they haven't made. No one needs to go with another “narrative” of each other.”
Bateman even created a custom gold medal with the “Victim Olympics” written on a ribbon, with Meghan and Harry making many charges against the royal family – allegedly questioning their son’s pores and skin color and that they were not “protected” by the media narrative.
“Meghan and Harry’s luck is the luck of social timing, and their calls to abuse them in their hands. 2020-2024 is actually the victim Olympics,” she quipped.
“Violet” creators wrote that they won the “gold medal” with Netflix enjoyed a $100 million response, which is reportedly a $20 million book with Penguin Random House Cope, and Markle has now lost $20 million with Spotify's Cope.
“The e-book deal is not that Harry is an unimaginable writer, the Spotify deal is not that they are both amazing speakers or fascinating interviewers, and the Netflix deal is not that they are famous performers or producers,” she claimed. “These are just people who cry to anyone who they will notice the 'accident' they maintain.”
Still, Bateman warned the couple that they now need to “make money.” [their] “Since people have been listening to their stories for 5 years now.
“The general public does not want to pay attention to those who lament their lack of privacy, but whether they do so, they must be made public in every alternative way,” she wrote.
“They were bored and saw a pair of royal haters who burned the bridge between them to the ashes and just fiercely insisted on their title as the former member of that royal family.”
Bateman summed up what she proposed, saying Markle, 43, and Harry, 40, “using smoke from previous patients’ days, in a whole new era where the victims are now in trouble.”
“I think everyone has a basket of abilities. I don't think Meghan or Harry spent some time finding their baskets,” she concluded. “If they took a while to supplement themselves and figure out who they are, I think there might be some interesting questions from it.”
Harry and Markle's representatives did not return a note request to the sixth page of the web page.
Still, Bateman is no stranger to sharing her strong opinions about Markle and Harry. She criticized them in advance for serving victims of Los Angeles wildfires in January.
She wrote on Jan. 11 in X: “Meghan Markle and Harry are no more chasing than ambulances. Are they “travel wounded”? Are they politicians now? They don't live here; they are vacationers. Disaster vacationers. #palisadesfire.”
Later, Supply defended Markle and Harry's activism and again patted her “offensive” reaction to Bateman.
An insider told us in January: “It’s offensive for Meghan and Harry, and anyone thinks it’s just a replacement for the photos.”
Supply shows that Markle moved to Montecito, California, where Harry and his two children, Archie and Princess Lilibet were born and raised in 2020 – so it could be her residence at any time. ”
“They also spent a lot of hours volunteering, more than the media even grabbed their time in their participation,” the insider said.
