Although Prince Harry's authorized battle for British security could not attract his favor, he did discover some “surprising truth” through his methods.
The Duke of Sussex revealed some of his findings in his official claims after Friday's ruling and intended to solicit the Security Council of the Government Royal and Public Figures (RAVEC) on the current losses.
“The court case ruling confirmed that the Royal and Public Figures Safety Commission (commonly known as the RAVEC), composed of senior officials of the royal family, residence workplaces and metropolitan police, did not comply with its personal mandatory procedures for me that were used for all different high-risk and productive people,” Harry wrote.
He also vowed to continue the case by writing to the residence secretary “to ask her to study the matter urgently and evaluate the RAVEC course.” ”
Harry went on to name the long-standing authorized battle “The Ultimate Resort,” but “reveals surprising truths that begin with the fact that the royal family is the key decision-maker for RAVEC, and my only illustrations are about my safety.”
He added: “I also realized all of these related names in this course, many of whom retired immediately after halfway through the course.”
Harry, 40, started publicly funded security after British authorities resigned and moved to the United States in 2020 after he decided to deprive him and his spouse Meghan Markle of their publicly funded security.
Nevertheless, he claimed in his assertion that the issue dates back to 2017, when the “secret committee” determined that his spouse was 43 years old and that she would not provide safe security when she formally joined the royal family. The choice ends up inverted after Harry's harshness.
The problem will only begin to develop in the next few years, resulting in Harry now without automatic state-supported security measures “from the start”.
The creator of “Stop” – involved in tense hatred, and his relationship with the state of affairs – is responsible for his family, as the problem lasts for such a long time.
“To this day, the royal family has left my only illustrations on each royal family and will be named as an assessment conducted at any level.”
“One potential conclusion that might be drawn is that they choose not to choose because they know that the end result will show that my safety should never be eliminated in the first place.”
Harry claimed that besides being threatened by violence from extremists, he and his family were threatened by neo-Nazis, making their security the highest priority for the fathers of both, as he traveled to the UK for a diverse visit.
“It all comes from the same institutions my mom preyed on, which boldly campaigned to eliminate our safety and continue to incite hatred of my direction, my spouse and even our children, and it’s at the same time in defending the same energy they need to take responsibility,” he said.
“The UK is my birthplace and can always be part of me. It's a place I really like, and this country is where my son was born,” Harry wrote. “I totally need to continue my charity work to support causes and people that mean a lot to me, and my young people to understand the greatness of my homeland.”
The Duke made the same comments about his family in a Bombshell BBC information interview initiated on Friday.
He also responded to his own remarks that the 76-year-old king had the ability to deal with him in phrases that he and his father, King Charles III, were usually not on speaking.
“My father probably has a lot of management and skills in his palms. In the end, that whole factor could be solved through him,” Harry said.
“Essentially, not through intervention, but through separation, allowing the consultant to do something crucial.”
Shortly after Harry's interview, a Buckingham Palace spokesman said in an announcement obtained by Mirror Britain that “all” of his safety points “had been repeatedly and carefully examined by the court, reaching the same conclusion on every incident.”
